Welcome back to another blog hop, with #OpenBook. Here’s this week’s prompt.
Don’t forget to click the link to see what everyone else has to say on this week’s subject. It’s at the end of my post.
Do you find it is harder to not unpack a plot in a movie, predicting what will happen, now that you write your own stories?
I’ve always had an analytical mind. It meant that I used to spot inconsistencies in the plots of TV shows, way back when I was a child. I learnt to keep my thoughts to myself, as I was constantly reprimanded for pointing these things out.
Apparently, I was spoiling other people’s enjoyment.
This always puzzled me. If things were so obviously wrong, how could you enjoy that? Teachers were quick enough to tell me when I was wrong, yet if I said something was wrong, that was unacceptable.
Anyhow, now I’m older and create plots of my own as a way of passing the time, I see it even more.
And it becomes harder to ignore, knowing that I try my best to avoid doing the same things in my own writing (although I’d be the first to admit I occasionally lapse).
I can spot a plot hole approaching at least an episode or a chapter away. It’s usually when a character’s actions start to become physically impossible.
Like when they travel vast distances in the blink of an eye. Or when days seem to last several weeks. Guns with unlimited ammunition. The list goes on.
There are also the characters who never sleep, know everything, or can survive things that ought to lay them low.
Then there is the vital piece of information that is supposed to be a revelation, but is inconsistent with the rest of the story or the thing it is supposed to prove. Like the stigmata scene in The Butterfly Effect movie.
Another recent source of irritation was the physical description of an object that was impossible, given its location and what it was doing.
Also, I see continuity issues (a jacket on a chair in one shot suddenly moves to another chair in the next is a classic example, car number plates that change during a chase is another) everywhere.
Then we come to the predictability of outcomes. Sadly, the quality of Red Herrings has reduced. Gone are the days when everyone was a genuine suspect.
Very often, it’s so easy to spot who the bad guy (or girl) is, or how they will be unmasked.
I don’t know if it’s because standards have dropped or that writing and plotting have made me even more observant.
I still keep my observations to myself. Mostly. After all, nobody likes a smart a**e.

What do you think about this week’s subject?
Let me know by leaving me a comment.
While you’re here, please click the InLinkz link to check out what my fellow writers have to say about this week’s topic.

I’ll be back with another post on Thursday, see you then. Meanwhile, have a great week.

I’d love to get your comments, please leave them below. While you’re here, why not take a look around? There are some freebies and lots more content, about me, my writing and everything else that I do. You can join my newsletter for a free novella and more news by clicking this link.

P.J. MacLayne
Too many shows seem to move from Point A to Point B with no twists and turns. But people like it that way.
Richard Dee
Maybe, I prefer the intellectual challenge of a well plotted scenario. With plenty of possible suspects and a good twist.
Lela Markham
Oh, yeah, it’s the little things. I was watching one of the Bourne movies (the one where he’s in Russia). In the theater, we watched this scene where Bourne’s car gets hit by a dozen others, comes to a stop, and then drives away. But I noticed the drive train lying on the pavement under the car during that brief stop.
I mentioned it to my husband as we were leaving the theater. He didn’t disbelieve me, but when the movie came out on streaming, he paused it at the point of discussion and sure enough — drive train clearly visible as detached for the vehicle for about two frames.
I’m sure that’s what happened in the actual filming and the editor cut it as close as possible, but I’ve often wondered how many other people noticed this glaringly obvious problem. No car is going anywhere with its drive train detached from it.
Richard Dee
Oh yes, that’s the sort of thing that really annoys me. As does the applied assumption that we’ll never notice.
Kelly Williams
I love it! Very clearly you were destined to this! You should get a job as a continuity person on film/tv. They’re really necessary to a project. I thought it would be an amazing job!
Richard Dee
Trouble is, it can spoil your enjoyment, when you’re permanently looking out for errors.